| 1 |
Agno (2026). The runtime for agentic software. https://www.agno.ai. Acessado em Março de 2026.
|
|
| 2 |
Arize AI (2024). Openinference: Open standard for llm observability. https://github.com/Arize-ai/openinference. Accessed: 2026-03-25.
|
|
| 3 |
Babuji, Y., Woodard, A., et al. (2019). Scalable parallel programming in python with parsl. In Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (Learning), PEARC ’19, pages 22:1–22:8. ACM.
|
|
| 4 |
BeeAI (2026). Agentic workflow framework. https://framework.beeai.dev/. Acessado em Março de 2026.
|
|
| 5 |
Chang, C.-C. and Echizen, I. (2025). The chronicles of foundation ai for forensics of multi-agent provenance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12612.
|
|
| 6 |
Cloud Native Computing Foundation (2024). Opentelemetry: Observability framework for cloud-native software. https://opentelemetry.io. Accessed: 2026-03-25.
|
|
| 7 |
CrewAI (2026). The leading multi-agent platform. https://crewai.com/. Acessado em Março de 2026.
|
|
| 8 |
Davis, D. B., Featherston, J., Fukuda, M., and Asuncion, H. U. (2017). Data provenance for multi-agent models. In 2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science), pages 39–48.
|
|
| 9 |
de Oliveira, D. C. M., Liu, J., and Pacitti, E. (2019). Data-Intensive Workflow Management: For Clouds and Data-Intensive and Scalable Computing Environments. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
|
|
| 10 |
Deelman, E., Ferreira da Silva, R., Vahi, K., Rynge, M., Mayani, R., Tanaka, R., Whitcup, W., and Livny, M. (2021). The pegasus workflow management system: Translational computer science in practice. Journal of Computational Science, 52:101200. Funding Acknowledgments: NSF 1664162.
|
|
| 11 |
Freire, J., Koop, D., Santos, E., and Silva, C. T. (2008). Provenance for computational tasks: A survey. Comput. Sci. Eng., 10(3):11–21.
|
|
| 12 |
Friedman, S., Rye, J., LaVergne, D., Thomsen, D., Allen, M., and Tunis, K. (2020). Provenance-based interpretation of multi-agent information analysis.
|
|
| 13 |
Gómez-Carmona, O., Casado-Mansilla, D., de Ipina, D. L., and García-Zubia, J. (2024). Human-in-the-loop machine learning: Reconceptualizing the role of the user in interactive approaches. Internet of Things, 25:101048.
|
|
| 14 |
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., and Liu, T. (2025). A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 43(2).
|
|
| 15 |
Missier, P., Belhajjame, K., and Cheney, J. (2013). The w3c prov family of specifications for modelling provenance metadata. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on extending database technology, pages 773–776.
|
|
| 16 |
Moraes, J. V., Ferrari, C., Rosseti, I., and de Oliveira, D. (2025). Exploring evolutionary patterns: A jupyter notebook for discovering frequent subtrees in phylogenetic tree data-bases. Journal of Information and Data Management, 16(1):232–239.
|
|
| 17 |
Pimentel, J. a. F., Murta, L., Braganholo, V., and Freire, J. (2017). noworkflow: a tool for collecting, analyzing, and managing provenance from python scripts. Proc. VLDB Endow., 10(12):1841–1844
|
|
| 18 |
Pinhanez, C., Cavalin, P., Sanctos, C., Grave, M., and Primerano, Y. (2025). The non-determinism of small llms: Evidence of low answer consistency in repetition trials of standard multiple-choice benchmarks
|
|
| 19 |
Plotzky, F., Britz, K., and Balke, W.-T. (2025). A conceptual model for attributions in event-centric knowledge graphs. Data Knowledge Engineering, 159:102449.
|
|
| 20 |
Schick, T., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Dessí, R., Raileanu, R., Lomeli, M., Hambro, E., Zettlemoyer, L., Cancedda, N., and Scialom, T. (2023). Toolformer: language models can teach themselves to use tools. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS ’23, Red Hook, NY, USA. Curran Associates Inc.
|
|
| 21 |
Silva, V., de Oliveira, D., Valduriez, P., and Mattoso, M. (2018). Dfanalyzer: runtime dataflow analysis of scientific applications using provenance. Proc. VLDB Endow., 11(12):2082–2085.
|
|
| 22 |
Sirqueira, T. F. M., Viana, M. L., Cunha, F. J. P. D., Nunes, I., and Lucena, C. J. P. D. (2018). Data provenance in multi-agent systems: relevance, benefits and research opportunities. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 13(1):9–19.
|
|
| 23 |
Souza, R., Gueroudji, A., DeWitt, S., Rosendo, D., Ghosal, T., Ross, R., Balaprakash, P., and Da Silva, R. F. (2025). Prov-agent: Unified provenance for tracking ai agent interactions in agentic workflows. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on eScience (eScience), pages 467–473. IEEE.
|
|
| 24 |
Souza, R., Skluzacek, T. J., Wilkinson, S. R., Ziatdinov, M., and da Silva, R. F. (2023). Towards lightweight data integration using multi-workflow provenance and data observability. In IEEE International Conference on e-Science.
|
|
| 25 |
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., Zhao, W. X., Wei, Z., and Wen, J. (2024). A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6):186345.
|
|
| 26 |
Zadra, N., Rizzoli, A., and Rota-Stabelli, O. (2024). Comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of zika virus: Insights into its origin, past evolutionary dynamics, and global spread. Virus Research, 350:199490.
|
|
| 27 |
Zhao, W. X. et al. (2023). A survey of large language models. arXiv:2303.18223, 1(2).
|
|