| 1 |
Aftan, S. et al. (2023). A survey on bert and its applications. In 2023 20th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T), pages 161–166. IEEE.
|
|
| 2 |
Amorim, A. et al. (2025). Exploring language model fusion to improve generalization in portuguese hate speech detection. In 2025 28th FUSION, pages 1–8.
|
|
| 3 |
Choshen, L. et al. (2022). Fusing finetuned models for better pretraining. CoRR, abs/2204.03044.
|
|
| 4 |
Devlin, J. et al. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proc. of the 2019 NAACL, pages 4171–4186, Minneapolis. ACL.
|
|
| 5 |
Freire, J. et al. (2008). Provenance for computational tasks: A survey. Computing in Science & Engineering, 10(3):11–21.
|
|
| 6 |
Herschel, M. et al. (2017). A survey on provenance: What for? what form? what from? The VLDB Journal, 26(6):881–906.
|
|
| 7 |
Howard, J. et al. (2018). Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. In Proc. of the 56th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Melbourne, pages 328–339. ACL.
|
|
| 8 |
Kerzel, D. et al. (2021). Towards tracking provenance from machine learning notebooks. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval.
|
|
| 9 |
Matena, M. et al. (2022). Merging models with fisher-weighted averaging.
|
|
| 10 |
Moreau, L. et al. (2015). The rationale of prov. Journal of Web Semantics, 35:235–257.
|
|
| 11 |
Padovani, G. et al. (2025). Provenance tracking in large-scale machine learning systems. In Workshop Proceedings of the 54th International Conference on Parallel Processing, ICPP Workshops ’25, page 167–174, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
|
|
| 12 |
Pina, D. et al. (2022). Capturing provenance from deep learning applications using keras-prov and colab: a practical approach. Journal of Information and Data Management, 13(5).
|
|
| 13 |
Pina, D. et al. (2025). Breadcrumbs for your deep learning model: Following provenance traces with dlprov. Software Impacts, 23:100730.
|
|
| 14 |
Schelter, S. et al. (2017). Automatically tracking metadata and provenance of machine learning experiments.
|
|
| 15 |
Schlegel, M. and Sattler, K.-U. (2023). Mlflow2prov: Extracting provenance from machine learning experiments. In Proceedings of the Seventh DEEM. ACM.
|
|
| 16 |
Souza, R. et al. (2019). Provenance data in the machine learning lifecycle in computational science and engineering. In 2019 IEEE/ACM Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS), pages 1–10.
|
|
| 17 |
Yadav, P. et al. (2023). Ties-merging: Resolving interference when merging models. In Neural Information Processing Systems.
|
|