SBBD

Paper Registration

1

Select Book

2

Select Paper

3

Fill in paper information

4

Congratulations

Fill in your paper information

English Information

(*) To change the order drag the item to the new position.

Authors
# Name
1 Vinicius Sousa(vinicius.sousa@ccc.ufcg.edu.br)
2 Cláudio Baptista(baptista@computacao.ufcg.edu.br)
3 André Luiz Alves(andre.alves@ifpb.edu.br)
4 Hugo Figueirêdo(hugo.figueiredo@ifpb.edu.br)

(*) To change the order drag the item to the new position.

Reference
# Reference
1 Abdin, M., et al. (2024). Phi-4 technical report. arXiv:2412.08905.
2 Almeida, Y., et al. (2024). AICodeReview: Advancing code quality with AI-enhanced reviews. SoftwareX, 26(101677).
3 Almeida Filho, F. G. de, et al. (2019). Prevalence of bad smells in PL/SQL projects. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC), pages 116–121. IEEE.
4 Fang, C., et al. (2024). Large language models for code analysis: Do LLMs really do their job? In 33rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 24), pages 829–846. Philadelphia, PA, USA. USENIX Association.
5 Google DeepMind (2024). Introducing Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era. (11 December 2024). Retrieved April 17, 2025 from https://blog.google/technology/google-deepmind/google-gemini-ai-update-december-2024/.
6 Gopinath, K. (2023). Exploring the role of large language models in automated code review and software quality enhancement. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 12(9):11428–11438.
7 Haider, M. A., Mostofa, A. B., Mosaddek, S. S. B., Iqbal, A., and Ahmed, T. (2024). Prompting and fine-tuning large language models for automated code review comment generation. arXiv:2411.10129.
8 Hassid, M., Remez, T., Gehring, J., Schwartz, R., and Adi, Y. (2024). The larger the better? Improved LLM code-generation via budget reallocation. arXiv:2404.00725.
9 Holden, D. and Kahani, N. (2024). Code linting using language models. arXiv:2406.19508.
10 Liu, H., Zhang, Y., Saikrishna, V., Tian, Q., and Zheng, K. (2024). Prompt learning for multi-label code smell detection: A promising approach. arXiv:2402.10398.
11 Lucas, K., Gheyi, R., Soares, E., Ribeiro, M., and Machado, I. (2024). Evaluating large language models in detecting test smells. arXiv:2407.19261.
12 Nascimento, D., Pires, C. E., and Massoni, T. (2013). PL/SQL Advisor: uma ferramenta baseada em análise estática para sugerir melhorias para procedimentos armazenados. In Anais do IX Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, pages 343–354, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. SBC.
13 OpenAI (2024). GPT-4o mini: advancing cost-efficient intelligence. (18 July 2024). Retrieved April 17, 2025 from https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-mini-advancing-cost-efficient-intelligence/.
14 OpenAI. (2024). GPT-4o system card. arXiv:2410.21276.
15 Opitz, J. (2024). A closer look at classification evaluation metrics and a critical reflection of common evaluation practice. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 12:820–836.
16 Russell, J., et al. (2003). PL/SQL User’s Guide and Reference, 10g Release 1 (10.1), chapter 1 Overview of PL/SQL. Oracle Corporation, Redwood City, CA, USA.
17 Sengamedu, S. and Zhao, H. (2022). Neural language models for code quality identification. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation, MaLTeSQuE 2022, pages 5–10, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
18 Sheikhaei, M. S., Tian, Y., Wang, S., and Xu, B. (2024). An empirical study on the effectiveness of large language models for SATD identification and classification. Empirical Software Engineering, 29(159).
19 Silva, L. L., Silva, J. R. da, Montandon, J. E., Andrade, M., and Valente, M. T. (2024). Detecting code smells using ChatGPT: Initial insights. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM '24, pages 400–406, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
20 Sun, Z., et al. (2024). Enhancing code generation performance of smaller models by distilling the reasoning ability of LLMs. arXiv:2403.13271.
21 Thomson, P. (2021). Static analysis: An introduction: The fundamental challenge of software engineering is one of complexity. Queue, 19(4), 29–41.
22 Yadav, P. S., Rao, R. S., Mishra, A., and Gupta, M. (2024). Machine learning-based methods for code smell detection: A survey. Applied Sciences, 14(14):6149.
23 Zhang, Z., et al. (2024). Unifying the perspectives of NLP and software engineering: A survey on language models for code. arXiv:2311.07989.