1 |
Bavota, G., Gravino, C., Oliveto, R., De Lucia, A., Tortora, G., Genero, M., and Cruz-Lemus, J. A. (2011). Identifying the weaknesses of uml class diagrams during datamodel comprehension. In International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pages 168–182. Springer.
|
|
2 |
Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., and Wimmer, M. (2017). Model-Driven Software Engineeringin Practice: Second Edition.Synthesis Lectures on Software Engineering, 3(1):1–207.
|
|
3 |
Chen, P. P.-S. (1976). The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM transactions on database systems (TODS), 1(1):9–36.
|
|
4 |
Calvanese, D., Lenzerini, M. On the interaction between ISA and cardinality constraints. In: Data Engineering, 1994. Proceedings.10th International Conference, v.14, no.18, p. 204-213, 1994.
|
|
5 |
Dullea, J., Song, I. Y., Lamprou, I. An analysis of structural validity in entity relationship modeling. Data and Knowledge Engineering, v. 47, n. 2, p. 167–205, 2003.
|
|
6 |
Elmasri, R. and Navathe, S. B. (2016). Fundamentals of Database Systems, Seventh Edition. Person, Boston, MA, USA.
|
|
7 |
Fidalgo, R. D. N., De Souza, E., España, S., De Castro, J., and Pastor, O. (2012). EERMM: A metamodel for the enhanced entity-relationship model. In Conceptual Modeling, volume 7532 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 515–524. Springer.
|
|
8 |
Song, Il-Yeol, Mary Evans, and Eun K. Park. A comparative analysis of entity-relationship diagrams. Journal of Computer and Software Engineering 3.4 (1995): 427-459.
|
|